Pages

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

LIVING IT UP IN BAHRAIN


From TODAY, Property
Thursday July 31, 2008

For those who want a piece of the action in the Middle East, CapitaLand has an attractive offer in Raffles City Bahrain. The waterfront project in Bahrain’s new city centre is being developed at some US $800 million ($1.1 billion) by the Raffles City Bahrain Fund, in which CapitaLand has a 37-per-cent stake. The project comprises three residential towers with a total of 600 units and includes high-end retail and food-and-beverage outlets. The freehold complex, which is on a 43,000 sq metre site, will also have 200 serviced apartments.

Within three weeks of a private sale launch for the Tower 2 residential block, 101 of the 124 apartments and penthouses for sale were booked.
ARTIST IMPRESSION COURTESY CAPITALAND

Green Living


From TODAY, Voices
Thursday July 31, 2008


Singapore going green...

Saved by bugs

From TODAY, World
Thursday July 31, 2008

SUR VIVING THE OUTBACK

Lost prospector ate termites to combat dehydration

SYDNEY — A former pest exterminator lost in the Australian desert for four days survived by eating termites and other insects, police said yesterday.

Gold prospector Theo Rosmulder, 52, from the southern state of Victoria, was suffering from dehydration but otherwise in “surprisingly good condition,” said Sergeant Graham Clifford of Western Australia state police. Mr Rosmulder was spotted by local Aborigines on Tuesday about 10 km from his camp.

The prospector, who once worked as a pest exterminator, told rescuers he staved off dehydration by eating insects and termites, which provided some moisture and protein.

“He kept eating what he used to kill,” Sgt Clifford said. “We were always confident we’d find him, but by the same token, four and a half days was starting to get a bit questionable.”

Mr Rosmulder had been searching for gold with his wife and a group of other prospectors about 130km north of Laverton, a mining town in Southwestern Australia. He became lost on Friday after heading out alone, Sgt Clifford said.

A massive search operation was launched at first light on Saturday, with dozens of searchers combing 200 sq km of the rocky terrain by land and air.

“The chap did say he saw planes on a number of occasions and waved items of clothing, but they didn’t attract attention,” Sgt Clifford said.

On Tuesday morning, members of a local Aboriginal community spotted Mr Rosmulder, who had hung onto his metal detector throughout the ordeal. They bumped into a rescue crew on the way back to camp.

----------
He kept eating what he used to kill.
Sergeant Graham Clifford on how former pest exterminator Theo Rosmulder kept himself alive
----------

Mr Rosmulder was treated at Laverton Hospital. He told officials he planned to continue his gold hunt and was in a remote desert area yesterday.

Mr Rosmulder’s light clothing offered little protection from the elements, but temperatures in the region were relatively mild for the Australian winter, ranging from 9 to 19°C, Sgt Clifford said.

Mr Rosmulder also conserved energy by spending the first two days in the same spot near an outcrop of rocks before trying to find his way back. AP

AL ZHEIMER’S breakthrough: New drug on the way

From TODAY, News
Thursday July 31, 2008

It can halt progress of the disease by 81 per cent

Hasnita Maji d

A DRUG that can slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease may be available here in about four years’ time.

A Singapore-based start-up, TauRx Therapeutics, has developed a drug, rember, which can attack the root of the problem.

Clinical trials done in 2004 and 2005, involving more than 300 patients in the United Kingdom and Singapore over a period of 19 months, showed that the treatment managed to stop the progression of the disease by 81 per cent.

During the same period, the patients did not experience a significant decline in their mental function.

Alzheimer’s, a degenerative disease that involves damage to important brain cells, causes forgetfulness, and in severe cases, hallucinations and behavioural changes.

Current therapies for Alzheimer’s do not affect the progress of the terminal disease itself, but provide only a temporary boost to mental function, with no longterm benefit. Proteins known as Tau tend to stick together to the brain cells as a person ages, but in some people, these proteins aggregate abnormally — damaging the brain cells, and leading to Alzheimer’s.

Dr Seng Shay Way, managing director of TauRx Therapeutics, said: “What our drug does is to stop them from sticking together and for those that have stuck together, we sort of dissolve them and break them apart, and hopefully restore function to the nerve cell and to the patient.”

Tests showed the drug had the biggest effect in the worst-hit part of the brain which has the highest density of the Tau protein aggregates.

The next phase of clinical trials has been planned, this time involving more than 1,000 patients from the European Union, the United States, Asia and the Middle East. If the trials prove successful, the drug will be available by 2012.

The company’s ultimate goal is to develop a product that could be widely used at the very earliest stages of the disease, long before patients experience the first symptoms of Alzheimer’s.

It is estimated that more than 20,000 people in Singapore are afflicted with Alzheimer’s Disease, and the statistic will grow as the population ages.

In the Asia Pacific, Alzheimer’s affects almost 14 million people — a number set to reach 64 million by 2050 — and has become a growing burden on health services

CHANNEL NEWSASIA

Treat foreigners the way you want to be treated

From TODAY, Voices
Wednesday July 30, 2008

Letter from
Gilbert Goh Keow Wah,

Sydney, New South Wales

WHENEVER I read about the challenges facing permanent residents and work permit holders in Singapore, I have mixed feelings, for I am a Singaporean who has just left the country to live and work in Sydney. So far, in Australia, I have yet to face any of the discrimination of which I have been warned. But, I feel how foreigners in Singapore may feel and hope that the locals will welcome me, and not see me as a threat to their livelihood.

In Sydney, I have seen a medium-sized company of about 100 employees boasting people of 10 different nationalities.

Such a diverse workforce not only allows creativity to take place but also creates respect and tolerance for one another’s culture and religion. There are two distinct nationalities settling down in Singapore: the Chinese and the Indians. They have formed almost 75 per cent of all our foreign talent for the past five years.

Many are competent professionals who are deserving of their residency in Singapore, but their cultural habits and working attitude are not much different from the local Chinese and Indian workforce. There is not much diversity they can bring to the workforce. In order to boast a strong cosmopolitan work force, our Government needs to cast the talent hunt search wider, from Europe, Africa, the United States and so on.

But, no matter where they originally come from, Singaporeans must welcome such foreign talents, which is what good global citizens should do. At the very least, we must not give them a hard time. For, one day, you may end up working and living abroad. Just like me.

Maladjusted: WHO ARE THESE KIDS FOOLING?

From TODAY, Plus
Friday July 25, 2008

PHIN WONG

Tween stars are making big bucks with their wholesome images. Does anyone buy it?

IS IT just me or does everyone have a halo these days?

You’ve seen them, haven’t you? They’re not ordinary halos — they’re manufactured in China, made with small movable parts children choke on, slathered in lead paint, assembled right next door to the poison pet foods factory.

If you look a little closer at the label, it reads “Channel” — as in 5, not Coco.

These halos belong to the angelic tween stars making massive business these days.

Fifteen-year-old Miley Cyrus, along with her alter-ego Hannah Montana, has a sold-out American tour and her 3D movie set a new Super Bowl weekend record, pulling in US$29 million ($39 million).

The Jonas Brothers — Nick, Joe and Kevin — pulled in 8.9 million viewers in the United States with their Disney TV movie Camp Rock, making it the second most-watched-TV movie of all time, ahead of the original High School Musical. Their soundtrack to Camp Rock has the No 3 position on the Billboard album chart.

Miley’s been featured in Vanity Fair. She’s been on Good Morning America talking about how she’s a good role model for kids.

To mark their full crossover from kiddy pop to mainstream domination, The Jonas Brothers — with their “purity rings” that 18-year-old Joe Jonas said “promises to ourselves and to God that we’ll stay pure till marriage” — are on the cover of music bible Rolling Stone magazine. “The Clean Teen Machine”, shouts the headline.

Well, I call their bluff. People, have we not learnt anything from history? It wasn’t that long ago that Britney Spears promised to stay a virgin till she got married.

Lindsay Lohan started off all cleancut and wholesome. A mere five years after Freaky Friday, Lindsay now has jail time, multiple DUI-related offences, rehab, and public display of her genitals on her resume, along with what seems to be a very public same-sex romance with DJ Samantha Ronson.

You couldn’t get more squeakyclean than the dimpled Vanessa Hudgens from High School Musical — until full-frontal naked pictures the starlet took of herself for her boyfriend were leaked on the Internet.

History is already beginning to repeat itself. Miley has had her MySpace account hacked into, resulting in provocative pictures of the clean tween star flashing her bra and posing in the shower being splashed on the Internet.

Already, rumours are swirling around gossip circles that two of the three Jonas boys haven’t been saving anything for marriage — except for maybe a townhouse or two. That’s after rumours of 15-year-old Nick Jonas being “friendly” with Miley (he was apparently the one she took those pictures for).

There are now reports of young Nick dating fellow Disney lass, 16-yearold Selena Gomez.

All three brothers are featured on the cover of Rolling Stone making broody come-hither faces. Either that, or they’re trying to hypnotise you into giving them your allowance.

Who wants to bet the kids are a hop, skip and click away from a sex tape?

Still, parents seem to take comfort in the fact that however manufactured their sunshine-y wholesome goodness might be, buying into these “positive role models” is still much better than exposing their kids to the mainstream reign of hip-hop, with their “pimps”, “hos” and “candy shops”.

Think again, mum.

Yes, 50 Cent and Lil Wayne make music that is sometimes violent, misogynistic and grammatically incorrect — but those guys come with a PG rating. If you’ve done a half-decent job as a parent, no kid is going to mistake gun-totting hip-hop gangsta rappers as adult-sanctioned role models.

Tween stars, on the other hand, are more insidious. They’re rated G. They’re in your homes without supervision. They’re the people your kids look up to. Let’s see you try to explain why Hannah Montana’s been arrested for driving under the influence. Oh, give it another year.

Maybe I’m being too harsh on Miley and the Jonases. After all, they’re young and they’re going to make the mistakes young people do — the fact that they’re rich and famous only makes it easier to make the same mistakes we did without getting caught by their parents.

It’s the adults who are to blame. The adults who market little girls as mini saints while dressing them in Lolitaesque off-the-shoulder tops. The adults who blindly allow their children to worship these false idols because they’re waspy white with good teeth. The adults who should know better.

This clean sweep is going to end with delicious dirt. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Tough times ahead for the office rental market?


From TODAY, Business
Friday July 25, 2008

Ten million more sq ft of space is expected to become available by 2012. Will it be too much?

How safe is your child?


From TODAY, Voices
Friday July 25, 2008

Letter from Olivia Khong

SO MUCH has been said about the safety of children in school buses, but no one has ever raised the issue of underage motorcycle pillion riders.

For years, I have witnessed young kids being ferried to and fro on motorcycles, wearing oversized helmets and clinging on for dear life.

My child’s classmate at his childcare centre has been a pillion rider on his father’s motorbike since he was three years old! Teachers have cautioned the parent against this, but to no avail.

So, to guilty dads out there: How much do you value your child’s life?

Soya and your sperm count

From TODAY, World, HEAL TH WATCH
Friday July 25, 2008

A diet high in soya may water down those little swimmers and lower fertility: Study

IN THE biggest human study into the effects of soya on fertility, a link between soya-rich diets and lower sperm counts has been detected.

The study, by Dr Jorge Chavarro at Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, showed that men who consumed more than two portions of soya-based foods a week had, on average, 41 million fewer sperm per millilitre of semen than men who had never eaten soya products.

The apparent fall in sperm count is unlikely to make healthy men infertile, but some experts said it could have a significant impact on those already with lower-than-average sperm counts.

A sperm count of between 80 million and 120 million per milliliter is regarded as normal, while men who produce fewer than 20 million sperm per millilitre are regarded as clinically subfertile.

The study builds on previous research in animals and on human tissues that has suggested certain ingredients in soya could harm sperm production.

Male fertility has been in decline in the West for several decades now, with about 20 per cent of young Europeans having a low sperm count, while levels of soya have risen steadily in the Western diet since the 1940s because it is a cheap source of protein.

Soya-based products are now found in two-thirds of manufactured food including biscuits, sweets, pasta and bread, according to the Institute of Food Research in Norwich.

In the study, Dr Chavarro and colleagues at Massachusetts General Hospital recruited 99 men who had visited a fertility clinic between 2000 and 2006.

The men answered a questionnaire which asked them about the amounts of 15 different soya foods they had eaten over the previous three months.

The researchers then put the men into four groups according to the levels of chemicals called isoflavones in their diets.

Isoflavones are ingredients in soya products that mimic the female sex hormone, oestrogen. Each man then provided a sperm sample for testing.

Dr Chavarro found that men who consumed at least half a portion of soya food a day had the lowest sperm counts.

“Our findings suggest that the greater the soya food intake is, the lower the sperm concentration, compared with men who never consume soya food,” said Dr Chavarro.

THE GUARDIA N

HELPING SINGLES MEET SINGLES

From TODAY, News, I Say
Friday July 25, 2008

ANSLEY NG

I AM almost ashamed to step into the video rental store near my home on a Saturday night alone. It is like an admission that I am single at 29 and a loser without a date.

But I am increasingly seeing other lone men browsing the shelves, too.

Sure, Pete’s girlfriend could be having a girls’ night out and Siong’s wife might be busy making dinner, but I’d like to think that these men, in their 20s and 30s, are single and, like me, not doing too much about to change that.

While there have been a mountain of suggestions about how to get Singaporeans to make babies, the single’s problem — one that has been receiving national attention lately — concerns the precursor to procreation: We have trouble meeting new people. Specifically, candidates who could turn out to be Ms Right or Mr Right.

Singles here, apparently, want to get hitched but the majority bemoan the lack of chances (or skills) to socialise, according to survey findings unveiled last week by the National Population Secretariat.

I know people around my age group who have given up trying. While I’m not one of those – yet – my attitude is, “I am really keen, but I won’t try very hard” and I suspect many other busy working singles think that way too. Call it inertia, if you will.

So it would be interesting to see what measures the Government unveils next month to help the singles-networking process along, and how different these will be from its early attempts at playing Cupid.

I refer, of course, to its Social Development Unit (SDU) which went into semiretirement in 2006 and passed its bow and quiver of arrows on to private matchmakers — which it now accredits — probably after realising it could no longer keep up with a more sophisticated and demanding market of single, young professionals.

There were, at last count, 30 of these dating agencies compared to 10 just two years ago, and the industry’s fecundity suggests more people are receptive to turning to one for help.

Still, too many younger men and women think the only place they can make new friends is at a noisy club or bar, and thus limit their chances. Or, their excuse is that that they are too busy with work to explore other avenues.

And while dating agencies may have glammed up their image, I daresay they, just like the SDU before them, still encounter resistance from those (like me) who feel only desperate people sign up and “I am not desperate, what”.

So, here’s my idea.

Have the push could come from the workplace, where many singles of marriageable age spend a lot of their time.

The National Family Council or another government agency could provide companies with incentives to pack their single employees off to dating agencies. In the same way that they send staff for training courses, employers could stipulate a number of hours that its single employees have to clock per quarter attending events arranged by a dating agency, like lunches, cocktails, outings. (Don’t laugh — yes, the situation may have gotten that bad.)

Companies could also be allowed to dip into the Manpower Ministry’s $20-million Work-Life Works! Fund, to organise monthly drinks sessions or outings at which their single staff can meet people from other firms. They could be from the same industry or just share the same building.

Even if no romantic links are forged, hey, at least their business or professional circle is widened.

Take-up of the fund, set up in August 2004 to help companies promote worklife harmony, has jumped from 160 in 2006 to 400 this year, so there is mounting interest among employers to ensure workers have a happy balance in life — by extension, one would expect better productivity and retention rates. Why not broaden that balance to include singles’ socialising needs?

But that’s for the future, hopefully.

Until my company helps to hook me up with other singles — say, from one of the legal or financial firms in our office building — would any one (female, preferably) care to join me for some tortilla chips, Chardonnay and Dr Zhivago this Saturday night?

$2.2m for brain injury after detox diet

From TODAY, World
Thursday July 24, 2008

WOMAN’S DIETING WOES

THE family of a British woman who suffered brain damage following a “detox” diet warned on Tuesday of the dangers of such regimes.

Ms Dawn Page received more than £800,000 ($2.2 million) in an out-of-court settlement after a diet in which she increased her water intake and decreased the amount of salt she consumed.

The 52-year-old mother of two, from Faringdon, southern England, began vomiting severely soon after starting the “hydration diet” in 2001. She was left with epilepsy and a brain injury affecting her memory, concentration and ability to speak normally.

She gave up her job as conference organizer and her family says she will not work again.

Ms Barbara Nash, the nutritional therapist she consulted, allegedly assured her that the vomiting was part of the detoxification process. Ms Nash, who calls herself a “nutritional therapist and life coach”, denies liability in the case and insists she was not guilty of substandard practice.

But Ms Page’s husband, Geoff, 54, yesterday warned of the dangers of “fad-type” diets. He said his wife was not obese but had just wanted to lose some weight.

“Just days after she started the hydration diet, she began to feel unwell ... Things went from bad to worse ... Her life has been seriously affected, perhaps ruined,” he said.

Geoff said his wife was advised to drink at least four pints of water a day. The therapy was known as the Amazing Hydration Diet. He added: “It’s important people understand how dangerous diets like these are.”

Ms Nash has a diploma from the College of Natural Nutrition, based in Tiverton, Devon.

Plexus Law, the firm that represented her in court, said all allegations of substandard practice made in the litigation would continue to be “firmly denied” and the settlement agreed was less than half the total claimed.

THE GUARDIAN

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Miss Universe 2008

According to Miss Venezuela, the fastest way to make a point is not to go straight to it but ‘to the curves’ – an answer that won her the crown. AFP

Bosses do not support families

Times have changed… can you relate to this one?

 

From My Say

MY PAPER WEDNESDAY JULY 16, 2008

 

IAGREE with Ms Esther Au Yong’s commentary “It’ll take more than baby bonus” (my paper, July 14).

 

Following the arrival of a new colleague who is single, it became apparent to a friend of mine that “singletons” are a preferred breed at the workplace.

 

It also dawned on her that marriage and family were “awful diseases” which her boss wished would disappear from the office.

 

Over a casual lunch, my friend’s boss told her: “I actually didn’t want to hire you because you were married.”

 

The concern was that married women would soon be sporting baby bumps, require frequent medical leave and eventually go on three months of maternity leave.

 

As mothers, their priorities would also be their children and family. Thus, the assumption is that they would not be able to devote all their time and attention to their work.

 

They would also take leave should their child fall sick or rush home when they get a call telling them that their child is hurt, said the boss. What work could get done? he asked.

 

The boss also said that if the company could manage without the employee during her maternity leave, then she must not expect to return and still have a job.

 

Additionally, the boss said that women should not be so stupid as to sacrifice their careers for family.

 

Should they get divorced, their husband would get custody of the children because, with a career, he is better equipped to provide for the kids. Hence, women should always put their careers first, the boss said.

 

Needless to say, this attitude shocked my friend and me.

 

Yes, if we have children, our families would naturally come first. Why should we be made to feel guilty about caring for them or feel guilty about having brought them into this world in the first place?

 

Married couples should be encouraged to have children and employers and the Government need to continually support them in this area.

 

The Government has done its part in providing child subsidies, but what about the employers? With employers holding such negative views about married women and family life, who would dare to have children?

 

Ms Michelle De Roza

Warmer Earth, troubled kidneys

From My Lifestyle - MOMENT

MY PAPER WEDNESDAY JULY 16, 2008

 

MORE people are likely to suffer from kidney stones as a result of global warming, said researchers at the University of Texas.

 

Kidney stones, formed from dissolved minerals in urine, can be extremely painful. They are often caused by dehydration.

 

If global warming trends continue – as projected by the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last year – countries can expect as much as a 30 per cent rise in this disease in some of their driest areas, said findings published in the Monday’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

 

The increased incidence of disease would represent between 1.6 million and 2.2 million cases in the US by 2050, costing the US economy as much as US$1 billion (S$1.3 billion) in treatment costs.

 

“This study is one of the first examples of global warming’s direct medical effect on humans,” said Margaret Pearle, professor of urology at University of Texas Southwestern and the paper’s senior author.

 

“When people relocate from areas of moderate temperatures to warmer climates, a rapid increase in stone risk has been observed. This has been shown in military deployments to the Middle East, for instance.”

 

The lead author of the research, Mr Tom Brikowski, compared kidney-stone rates with UN temperature-increase forecasts, and created two mathematical models to predict its impact.

 

One showed an increase in the southern half of the US, including the existing “kidney-stone belt” of the south-eastern states.

 

“Similar climate-related changes in the prevalence of kidney-stone disease can be expected in other stone belts worldwide,” the study said.

– AFP

Experts stumped by common bug

From My News – World

MY PAPER WEDNESDAY JULY 16, 2008

 

LONDON: Experts at London’s world-famous Natural History Museum are being stumped by a common bug in their own back yard.

 

They pride themselves on being able to classify and display thousands of species – from birds and mammals to insects, dinosaurs and snakes – and are confident can identify most living things on the planet.

 

Except a tiny red-and-black bug that has appeared in the museum’s own gardens.

 

The almond-shaped insect, the size of a grain of rice, was first seen in March last year on some of the plane trees that grow on the grounds of the 19th-century museum, its collections manager, Mr Max Barclay, said yesterday.

 

Within three months, it had become the most common insect in the garden, and had also been spotted in other central London parks, he said.

 

The museum has more than 28 million insect species in its collection, but none is an exact match for this insect. Still, Mr Barclay was cautious about calling it a new discovery.

 

The museum will be involving international experts to analyse the bug’s body shape, form and DNA to see if it has been discovered before.

 

“I don’t expect to find a new species in the gardens of a museum,” he said.

 

“Deep inside a tropical rainforest, yes, but not in central London.”

 

The bug resembles the Arocatus roeselii, which is usually found in central Europe, but is a brighter red and lives on alder trees.

 

Entomologists suspect the new bug could be a version of the roeselii that has adapted to live on plane trees, but admit it could be a whole new species.

-AP

Monday, July 14, 2008

Maids more aware of rights

From My Say

MY PAPER MONDAY JULY 14, 2008

 

I CANNOT agree more with the commentary “No one has the right to mistreat maids” (my paper, July 10).

 

Self-centred employers have been responsible for the many instances of maid abuse as they are more concerned about the well-being of their own households.

 

Along the way, they neglect the essential task of showing their domestic helpers how to improve the quality of their work.

 

It is true that there are issues caused by workers who find it difficult to adapt to their new environment.

 

This can especially be the case when they are in a foreign land for the first time.

 

Add to this the problems if bosses fail to try and understand the background or problems of their maids.

 

Many ugly incidents arise from miscommunication or a lack of communication.

 

Whatever their needs may be, it is important for employers to lend a willing and attentive ear to maids who have grievances, personal or otherwise.

 

Any ill-treatment of domestic helpers should not be tolerated in our present society.

 

Many employers have not realised that today’s domestic workers cannot be taken for granted anymore.

 

Nowadays, maids are better-educated and are more aware of their rights and expectations with regard to their job situation.

 

Hence, employers must shed their old concepts and regard modern-day maids in a whole new light, so that there will be positive employer-maid relationships.

 

Mr Jeffrey Law

Sunday, July 13, 2008

It'll take more than baby bonus

ON FOSTERING A BABY-LOVING SOCIETY

 

From My News - Home

MY PAPER MONDAY JULY 14, 2008

 

ESTHER AU YONG

 

AS a newlywed, there is one question that keeps coming my way.

 

The ubiquitous “So, when are you having kids?”

 

Or this: “How many children are you planning to have?”

 

What I actually hear is this, really: “Are you willing to give up your career to have kids?”

 

This is the issue I’ve grappled with since my relationship with my husband (then boyfriend) became more serious about two years ago.

 

He has known since he was a teen that he wanted children of his own.

 

I, on the other hand, have always been sitting on the fence.

 

It’s not because of the fear of pregnancy – the pain involved during delivery and the nine months’ long “suffering” – or the realities and hardship of bringing up children.

 

I’m quite confident that somehow – with lots of help from my spouse and our parents – I’ll get through those stages. And I’ll very likely enjoy them too.

 

After all, despite my reservations, I do firmly believe that children are blessings from God.

 

It’s also not the cost of bringing up children, which I’m sure through perseverance and resourcefulness, we’ll manage.

 

I’m also grateful that the Government has recognised the financial strain placed on many families, who choose to have children, by offering timely relief, like the baby bonus and other subsidies.

 

Just last week, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew hinted that even more may be done to foster a pro-family environment.

 

Singapore may be going the Swedish way in time to come – this means free childcare and parental leave, which can be taken by fathers, of up to 13 months.

 

So, the truth of the matter is this: I’m afraid I will hate my children if they get in the way of me achieving my personal goals, especially those on my career path.

 

Let’s face it, Singapore bosses value productive employees. Employees who are around; who can take on extra work as and when required; who are flexible enough to travel on short notice.

 

A female finance manager, 29, summed the situation up in a local newspaper last week: “With three months’ maternity leave, morning sickness and numerous medical certificates, a mum will be less productive than a peer who is free of the above.”

 

Besides, mothers are seen as traditional caregivers. No matter how willing their husbands are to stay at home, society still dictates that mothering is a woman’s responsibility.

 

That’s why the challenge for working mothers here is a cultural one.

 

Even in Sweden, more than 80 per cent of parental leave is still taken by mothers, “making it difficult for women to compete on equal terms with men in the labour market”, the same newspaper reported.

 

I do think that the Government should take the initiative and help in educating local companies and bosses to be more open and receptive to high-flying working mums.

 

Still, society in general needs to change its values to a set that’s more balanced. I may be naive, but I’m sure with the right support, the career woman and the loving mummy can co-exist.

 

And I hope this co-existence can materialise before my fertile years run out.

 

myp@sph.com.sg

Pedestrians must be careful too

From My Say

MY PAPER FRIDAY JULY 11, 2008

 

RECENTLY, there has been a road safety campaign with advertisements featuring pedestrians of various age groups appealing to motorists to look out for them on the road.

 

I think the campaign is sending the wrong message to pedestrians.

 

While one of the major responsibilities of a motorist is to look out for pedestrians, the pedestrians should also be responsible for their own safety – they should look out for vehicles too.

 

I have seen many pedestrians crossing roads or walking in carparks while talking on their mobile phones without looking out for vehicles.

 

They take for granted that the cars will stop to let them cross. They do not consider the fact that their actions could force vehicles to brake suddenly.

 

Once, my brother was driving along a narrow side road when he spotted a mother pushing a stroller standing in the middle of the road, gesturing for her toddler, who was still on the pedestrian pavement, to join her in crossing the road.

 

My brother sounded the horn but was ignored. He had to stop his vehicle, thereby causing a minor traffic jam, before he could proceed.

 

I often see pedestrians who, despite seeing oncoming vehicles, still dash across the road. They might save a few minutes, but do so at the risk of injuring themselves and other road users.

 

Perhaps we could consider having a campaign featuring motorists appealing for pedestrians to look out for vehicles too.

 

Ms Yuen Mei Peng

Keeping food diary is good tool for weight loss plan

From My Lifestyle

MY PAPER WEDNESDAY JULY 9, 2008

 

WASHINGTON: Keeping a food diary – a detailed account of what you eat and drink and the calories it packs – is a powerful tool in helping people lose weight, researchers from the United States said yesterday.

 

The study involving 1,685 middle-aged men and women over six months found those who kept such a diary just about every day lost about twice as much weight as those who did not.

 

The findings buttressed earlier research that endorsed the value of food diaries in helping people lose weight.

 

Companies including Weight Watchers International Inc use food diaries in their weight-loss programmes.

 

“For those who are working on weight loss, just writing down everything you eat is a pretty powerful technique,” Dr Victor Stevens of Kaiser Permanente’s Center for Health Research in Portland said.

 

“It helps the participants see where the extra calories are coming from, and then develop more specific plans to deal with those situations,” said Dr Stevens, who helped lead the study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

 

The technique also helps hold dieters accountable for what they are eating, Dr Stevens said.

 

The study involved people from four US cities and their average weight loss was about 6 kg.

 

The average age of people in the study was 55.

 

– REUTERS

Does Classical Music Make Kids Smarter?

From Parent Resources, msn Encarta online

 

 

Raise your hand if you've heard that listening to Mozart can make kids smarter.

Okay, you can put your hand down now. You look a little silly waving it in the air like that. And while we're on the topic of silly things, let's talk about that "Mozart effect."

Much ado has been made about the magic of the boy-genius musician, so it's understandable that so many of us believe his brilliance can somehow buff our children's brains, centuries after his death.

Books have been written in support of this idea. A popular line of Baby Mozart videos for infants is now on many a baby-registry list. And former Georgia governor Zell Miller even set aside tax dollars so that parents of every baby born in his state would get a CD of brain-boosting classical music.

The problem is, there is no Mozart effect.

Since it was first publicized over a decade ago, scientists have deflated claims that classical music boosts brainpower.

Despite that, belief in the Mozart effect is stronger than ever--or so concluded a pair of professors at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business.

So what happened? And does music make kids smarter at all? Is it worth buying those Baby Mozart videos, just in case?

Here's where the Mozart madness began. In 1993, the journal Nature published an article by scientists at the University of California-Irvine. In their experiment, students listened to a Mozart sonata, a relaxation tape, or nothing at all for ten minutes, and then took a spatial reasoning test.

The students who listened to Mozart scored highest, an effect that lasted for 10 or 15 minutes. The researchers concluded that Mozart's music had helped. (Some later pointed out the possibility that Mozart's effect was neutral, but relaxation tapes and silence hurt the students' performance.)

From this study arose the Myth of Mozart. And it grew from there. Even though the original test had nothing to do with babies or small children, the idea stuck in the craw of our collective consciousness.

The Stanford researchers noted the media latched on to that particular Nature report more than any others published around the same time. And as it swirled around the media, people started talking about the effect on babies' intelligence, even though no research made these links.

And even after a 1999 review showed that 12 subsequent studies had failed to verify the famous 1993 one, people still believed in the magic of Mozart.

It's understandable. We all want our kids to be smart--and if something as easy as popping in a CD makes a difference, well, super!

What's more, classical music isn't as palatable to many people of parenting age as, say, the Red Hot Chili Peppers or Cake. Like spinach, it has to be good for you, right? What's more, old people listen to it!

The moral of this story: Kids should listen to classical music if they like it. But it won't make them smarter. Unless ...

That's right. There's a catch. In a University of Toronto at Mississauga study, music has been shown to increase IQ points in six-year-olds who took weekly singing or piano lessons. If your kids learn to sing or play an instrument, they just might become smarter.

So you don't have to turn your back on Mozart, after all. Kids just have to work hard to learn to play or sing his music for it to actually boost their little brains.

The students who listened to Mozart scored highest, an effect that lasted for 10 or 15 minutes. The researchers concluded that Mozart's music had helped. (Some later pointed out the possibility that Mozart's effect was neutral, but relaxation tapes and silence hurt the students' performance.)

From this study arose the Myth of Mozart. And it grew from there. Even though the original test had nothing to do with babies or small children, the idea stuck in the craw of our collective consciousness.

The Stanford researchers noted the media latched on to that particular Nature report more than any others published around the same time. And as it swirled around the media, people started talking about the effect on babies' intelligence, even though no research made these links.

And even after a 1999 review showed that 12 subsequent studies had failed to verify the famous 1993 one, people still believed in the magic of Mozart.

It's understandable. We all want our kids to be smart--and if something as easy as popping in a CD makes a difference, well, super!

What's more, classical music isn't as palatable to many people of parenting age as, say, the Red Hot Chili Peppers or Cake. Like spinach, it has to be good for you, right? What's more, old people listen to it!

The moral of this story: Kids should listen to classical music if they like it. But it won't make them smarter. Unless ...

That's right. There's a catch. In a University of Toronto at Mississauga study, music has been shown to increase IQ points in six-year-olds who took weekly singing or piano lessons. If your kids learn to sing or play an instrument, they just might become smarter.

So you don't have to turn your back on Mozart, after all. Kids just have to work hard to learn to play or sing his music for it to actually boost their little brains.

 

Martha Brockenbrough

Martha Brockenbrough lives, writes, and plays in Seattle. She is the author of It Could Happen to You: Diary of a Pregnancy and Beyond and she produces the Web site for the Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar.

 

 

Learn More! Also from Martha: